Key passage

Matthew 7:13-14

The two ways, one leading to destruction and the other to life, with few finding the narrow one.

The text

“Enter in by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter in by it. Hownarrow is the gate, and restricted is the way that leads to life! Few are those who find it.
Matthew 7:13-14WEB, World English Bible, which is in the public domain

The immediate context

Near the close of the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus contrasts a wide gate and an easy road with a narrow gate and a hard road, and names the outcome of each: destruction on one side, life on the other.

Where it sits in the canon

The pairing of destruction with life belongs to a wider New Testament pattern in which the alternative to eternal life is named by loss of life rather than by a different quality of continued life. John 3:16 uses perishing, Romans 6:23 uses death, and Philippians 3:19 says of the enemies of the cross that their end is destruction.

Why it matters

It supplies the word Jesus chooses for the outcome of the broad road, and it also supplies the observation that the group on that road is the larger one. Both claims shape almost every downstream argument about the justice and the character of God.

How the passage is interpreted

The eternal conscious torment reading

Defenders of eternal conscious torment read destruction here as ruin rather than extinction, in the way a building can be a ruin and still stand, or a lost coin can be lost without ceasing to exist. On this reading Jesus is naming an outcome of total loss without naming its metaphysics, and the force of the saying lies in the seriousness of the road and the fewness of those who avoid it.

The conditionalist reading

Conditionalists take the word in its ordinary sense and note that it stands opposite life rather than opposite joy. The source document counts roughly ten New Testament contrasts with eternal life and observes that they use perishing, death, passing away, not having life, wrath, judgment and destruction. Reading destruction here as ruined but surviving forces the same rereading on every other member of that set.

Where the readings agree

  • The two roads have genuinely different destinations.
  • The road that does not lead to life is the one most people take.
  • The outcome is final and is to be avoided at all costs.

Where the disagreement lies

Whether the destruction at the end of the broad road is a permanent condition of ruin that the person continues to undergo, or the ending of the person as a living being.

Editorial notes

  • The case uses this passage in its preface and appendices as the basis for the claim that the group facing judgment is the larger one.
  • The source document labels the net-outcome argument built on this verse as a philosophical argument that carries no evidential weight of its own.

Where this passage appears in the case

  • John 3:16Perishing set against eternal life, and not seeing life set against wrath that remains.
  • Romans 6:23The wages of sin is death, set against eternal life as the free gift of God.
  • Matthew 25:31-46The sheep and the goats, closing with eternal punishment set against eternal life.

Sources consulted for this passage

  1. Phil Welch. My case for Conditional Immortality/Annihilation (CI) instead of Eternal Conscious Torment (ECT). Working document, revised through 2026. 2023-03-01 Details
  2. Joseph Dear. The Bible Teaches Annihilationism. 1st edition, PDF version. 2016. approximately 590 pages View original of The Bible Teaches Annihilationism (opens in a new tab) Details

Scripture is quoted from the World English Bible, which is in the public domain. This page was last reviewed .